Alrakamiya Broker Review

Alrakamiya is an online brokerage platform operating through the domains alrakamiya.com and alra-kamiya.link. The company claims to have been active for over 8 years and to be registered in Cyprus. However, no verifiable registration details or company identifiers are available. Independent reviews suggest that the project only began operating in 2025. There is no transparent information regarding legal entities, ownership, or official contact details on the broker’s website.

Regulation and Licensing

Alrakamiya claims to be regulated by major authorities such as the FCA (UK), DFSA (UAE), VFSC (Vanuatu), and CSSF (Luxembourg). However, these claims are unsubstantiated. Public records from these regulators contain no entries related to Alrakamiya. In addition, the Central Bank of Russia has officially listed Alrakamiya as a firm exhibiting signs of illegal activity in the financial markets. This indicates that the broker is operating without a valid license in jurisdictions where financial services require authorization.

Markets and Instruments

Alrakamiya positions itself as a CFD broker offering access to a variety of financial instruments:

• Forex currency pairs
  
• Equities of major global companies
  
• Precious metals
  
• Cryptocurrencies
  
• Stock indices
  
• Commodities
  

While the platform advertises wide market access, actual availability and execution of these instruments cannot be confirmed without opening a trading account.

Account Types and Trading Conditions

The broker advertises three account tiers:

1. Standard — minimum deposit of $100, basic features, leverage up to 1:100
   
2. Advanced — minimum deposit of $1,000, access to more markets including cryptocurrencies, leverage up to 1:500, so-called “deposit insurance”
   
3. Professional — minimum deposit of $10,000, 24/7 manager support, personalized trading conditions, maximum leverage up to 1:500
   

Alrakamiya does not disclose essential trading terms such as spreads, commissions, margin requirements, or order execution rules. The lack of transparency raises significant concerns.

Trading Platform and Features

The broker provides access to its proprietary web-based platform (WebTrader), available via browser. There is no integration with trusted platforms like MetaTrader 4 or 5. Basic charting tools, pending orders, and trade history are reportedly available, but no technical specifications such as liquidity sources, data feeds, or execution speed are provided. This limits the platform’s credibility and suitability for active or professional traders.

Deposits and Withdrawals

Alrakamiya supports several payment methods:

• Bank cards (Visa, Mastercard)
  
• Bank wire transfers
  
• E-wallets
  
• Cryptocurrencies (e.g., Bitcoin, Tether)
  

While deposits are reportedly processed within 48 hours, clients often complain about severe difficulties with withdrawals. Many report that once a withdrawal request is made, the broker demands additional payments (taxes, insurance, handling fees), and still fails to release the funds even after these are paid. There is no transparent fee structure or processing timeline for withdrawals published on the website.

Client Feedback and Complaints

User reviews of Alrakamiya are overwhelmingly negative. The most common complaints include:

• Inability to withdraw funds
  
• Demands for additional undisclosed fees
  
• Account blockages after withdrawal requests
  
• High-pressure tactics from so-called personal account managers
  

There is no verifiable evidence of any user successfully profiting or withdrawing funds from the platform. These patterns are consistent with high-risk or fraudulent operations.

Regulatory Warnings

The Central Bank of Russia issued an official warning against Alrakamiya, listing it among entities exhibiting signs of illegal financial activity. This is a strong indicator that the broker is not authorized to operate in the country and further suggests broader compliance violations. No regulatory agency has issued a valid license for this broker.

Conclusion on broker

Alrakamiya lacks transparency, proper regulation, and a proven track record. The absence of verified licenses, combined with misleading claims, poor user feedback, and official regulatory warnings, clearly indicates that this broker is not trustworthy. All available evidence suggests that Alrakamiya is a high-risk and potentially fraudulent operation. Traders and investors are strongly advised to avoid this platform and instead choose a regulated broker with a transparent history and clear legal standing.

Mesojetus Broker Review

Mesojetus positions itself as an international online broker offering financial trading services. Official website: mesojetus.com. An additional mirror domain, ms-jetus.click, is also in use. The company lists its address as Krausenstrasse 9-10, 10117 Berlin, Germany. In reality, this location belongs to a coworking space (Mindspace), and no permanent office for the broker is found there.

The domain mesojetus.com was registered in 2021, with active website use traced only since 2025. Claims of having many years of experience are not supported by verifiable data.

Regulation and Licensing

The website lists several financial regulators:

• DFSA (Dubai Financial Services Authority)
  
• VFSC (Vanuatu Financial Services Commission)
  
• CSSF (Luxembourg)
  
• FCA (UK)
  

The license numbers listed on the website could not be verified in the official registers of these authorities. The company is not licensed in any of the mentioned jurisdictions. Searches in the FCA, DFSA, and BaFin databases show no registration for Mesojetus.

On September 3, 2025, the Central Bank of Russia included Mesojetus in its list of entities showing signs of illegal activity in the financial market.

Trading Platform and Instruments

Mesojetus offers its proprietary web-based platform (WebTrader). Basic features are included: order placement, charting tools, and technical analysis. However, user reviews frequently report issues such as freezing orders, platform lags, and unstable performance.

Declared tradable instruments include:

• Forex (over 45 currency pairs)
  
• Global stocks
  
• Cryptocurrencies (over 30 instruments)
  
• Indices, ETFs, metals, and commodities
  

Account Types and Conditions

Three account types are offered:

• Standard: minimum deposit $1,000, leverage up to 1:20
  
• Advanced: from $25,000, leverage up to 1:50
  
• Professional: from $50,000, leverage up to 1:100, personal account manager
  

Additionally, investment plans promising returns up to 3.5% per month are advertised. These rates are unrealistic and not typical of regulated brokers.

Deposits and Withdrawals

Officially, Mesojetus claims to support deposits via bank cards, e-wallets, and cryptocurrencies. In practice, most payments are accepted only in cryptocurrencies: BTC and USDT (TRC-20).

Customer complaints indicate frequent issues with withdrawals. Common patterns include:

• Requests for additional payments such as “taxes” or “fees”
  
• Redirecting users to another domain or subdomain
  
• Threats to block the account unless further payments are made
  

Reputation and Client Feedback

Online reviews are predominantly negative. Major complaints include:

• Inability to withdraw funds
  
• Aggressive pressure and threats from broker representatives
  
• Unexpected extra charges
  
• Discrepancies between advertised and actual trading conditions
  

There are no credible positive reviews. Some fake positive comments may exist but lack authenticity.

Legal Transparency

The website provides no information about the legal entity behind the project. No company name, registration number, or legal documents are disclosed. The only contact method is the email address [email protected]. No phone number or alternative contacts are available.

The claimed jurisdiction under Vanuatu law contradicts the supposed German business address, indicating further inconsistency.

Connected Websites

The domains ms-jetus.click and mesojetus.com are directly linked. Mesojetus appears to be associated with other suspicious platforms (e.g., Lavrajim, Bteksoft) that follow similar deceptive practices.

Conclusion on broker

Mesojetus operates without a valid financial license. There is no regulation, no verified legal structure, and no transparency. The Central Bank of Russia has issued an official warning. Multiple user complaints describe blocked withdrawals and fraudulent behavior.

Trading through Mesojetus poses a high risk of financial loss. It is strongly advised to avoid engaging with this platform.

Bitwave Capital Broker Review 2025

Bitwave Capital aggressively markets itself as an “innovative platform for professional trading,” using promises of “minimal spreads” and “global market access” to lure retail investors. Our comprehensive investigation reveals this is a classic bucket shop operation, whose entire infrastructure and business plan are engineered solely for the systematic theft of client deposits. The firm holds an abysmal independent trust rating of 0.99 out of 10.

The Regulatory Ghost: Operating in a Void of Legal Compliance

The legitimacy of any broker rests on its regulation. Bitwave Capital has none, relying instead on a deliberate strategy of concealment and falsification to appear credible.

The Absolute Regulatory Black Hole

Bitwave Capital holds NO valid licenses from any reputable, top-tier global regulator, including the FCA (UK), CySEC (Cyprus), BaFin (Germany), or ASIC (Australia). The company’s activity is completely unsupervised, meaning clients have zero legal protection under any internationally recognized financial directive.

The broker’s illegality is further confirmed by state authorities. The Central Bank of Russia (CBR) has officially added Bitwave Capital to its List of Illegal Financial Market Participants. This is a critical, formal verdict confirming the project’s fraudulent nature.

Jurisdictional Deception and Anonymity

The company claims to maintain an office in Cyprus. However, official checks of the Cypriot registry confirm that no entity named Bitwave Capital is legally registered there. The broker intentionally operates from an anonymous, undisclosed location to obstruct any potential legal claims from victims.

Fabricated Promises and Phony Documents

The “regulatory documents” displayed on the Bitwave Capital website are demonstrably fake. They contain contradictory dates and feature stamps belonging to non-existent or unrelated “controlling bodies.”

The company uses promises of “deposit insurance up to €20,000” to hook clients. Victims report that when they try to claim this security, customer support dismisses it as a “new client promotion” or imposes impossible, retroactive conditions.

The Predatory Business Model: Engineering Account Liquidation

Bitwave Capital functions as a “kitchen” (bucket shop), where personal managers and the trading platform collaborate to ensure the complete liquidation of client capital.

The Coercive Deposit Funnel

New clients are deliberately shown unrealistically high returns in demo modes or during initial low-volume trades. This psychological bait is designed to build false trust and encourage maximum deposits.

The so-called “Personal Managers” are high-pressure sales agents trained in coercive tactics. They aggressively push clients to deposit increasingly large sums, often resorting to threats to freeze already invested assets if the client refuses to comply.

Platform Manipulation and Fund Seizure (The Fake Loss)

The primary method of theft is the platform freeze. When a trader attempts to close a losing position or make a critical trade, the platform “deliberately freezes.” After this “technical glitch,” the client is informed that their funds were lost due to “sudden market spikes.” This simulates a genuine market force majeure to clear the account.

Bitwave Capital imposes mandatory trading bonuses with unachievable withdrawal conditions. For example, clients are required to execute a trading turnover 50 times the deposit amount before they can withdraw any of their own funds. This is a deliberate, legally indefensible maneuver to permanently lock capital within the scam system.

Client Experience: The Blockade and The Silent Disappearance

The accounts of Bitwave Capital’s victims follow a consistent, chilling pattern of theft and abandonment.

Account Locking and Unjustified Seizure

Numerous clients report that immediately following a large deposit, their trading accounts are unilaterally blocked. Customer support provides absurd accusations of “rule violations” but offers no evidence, resulting in a permanent communication blackout.

Upon attempting withdrawal, clients are subjected to artificial administrative barriers. The system demands continuous, endless cycles of “verification,” dragging the process out for months. All queries are either ignored or met with vague, non-committal responses.

Manager Abandonment

Once the maximum profitable deposit is secured, the “Personal Curator” immediately ceases all communication. The victim is left alone with a locked account and irrecoverable stolen funds.

FINAL CONCLUSION: Steer Clear of This Financial Threat

Bitwave Capital exhibits every definitive characteristic of a well-organized financial fraud: a fabricated legal structure, official government warnings, coercive sales tactics, and systematic refusal to honor withdrawal requests.

Maximum Warning: Investing a single dollar with Bitwave Capital carries the maximum risk of total capital loss. Do not trust this platform. Protect your assets by exclusively choosing brokers with verifiable ownership, transparent financial audits, and genuine licenses from reputable global regulators (FCA, ASIC, CySEC).

FINAL VERDICT: BITWAVE CAPITAL IS A DOCUMENTED, NON-REGULATED FINANCIAL SCAM. The firm operates with fabricated documents, is blacklisted by central banks, and guarantees total capital loss for every investor.

Bigarizonaco Broker Review

Bigarizonaco (official website: bigarizonaco.com) presents itself as an international online broker offering a broad range of financial services. The website provides contact details, including a Cypriot address (Petraki Giallourou 4, Aradippou 7102, Cyprus) and a phone number: +357 24 618 881. The platform is available in multiple languages, including English and Russian.

The broker claims to have been operating since 2017. However, domain registration records show that the website was created only in 2021. This discrepancy raises questions about the company’s real operational history. Additionally, the domain ownership changed hands in 2025, suggesting a possible rebranding or transfer of control.

Services and Trading Conditions

Bigarizonaco offers typical retail brokerage services. The website highlights the following features:

• Three account types with minimum deposits ranging from $100 to $10,000.
  
• Trading in forex, CFDs, stocks, and cryptocurrencies (though details are vague).
  
• A proprietary trading platform (no technical specs or platform name provided).
  
• Multi-currency funding options.
  
• Deposits via credit cards and electronic wallets.
  

Despite a seemingly broad offering, there are serious concerns. The platform lacks public documentation, there’s no demo access, and technical transparency is minimal.

Regulation and Licensing

Bigarizonaco is not regulated by any recognized financial authority such as:

• FCA (UK)
  
• CySEC (Cyprus)
  
• ASIC (Australia)
  
• DFSA (UAE)
  
• Bank of Russia
  

The website previously listed various licenses and registration numbers. Upon verification, all these licenses turned out to be fake, misused, or tied to unrelated or nonexistent entities. Some were even traced back to fabricated regulator websites.

The Central Bank of Russia has officially listed Bigarizonaco as a company with signs of illegal activity in the financial markets. The broker does not appear in any official registry of licensed financial firms, either in Russia or internationally.

Reputation and Customer Feedback

Most reviews about Bigarizonaco are negative. Users report issues with withdrawing funds, aggressive sales tactics, and arbitrary charges. Common complaints include:

• Withdrawal requests being blocked unless an additional “tax” or “processing fee” is paid.
  
• Account suspensions after refusal to pay extra fees.
  
• Persistent cold calls and pressure to deposit more funds.
  
• Refusals to provide transaction histories or trading reports.
  

Genuine positive reviews are rare or appear to be fake. The broker has virtually no presence on reputable forums or financial communities, which undermines trust.

Signs of Fraud

Several red flags suggest Bigarizonaco operates as a scam rather than a legitimate broker:

• Fake licenses and registration claims.
  
• False operating history (domain created in 2021 while claiming to exist since 2017).
  
• Unclear fund withdrawal policies and lack of legal guarantees.
  
• Use of cloned websites with different domain names but identical content.
  
• Total absence of regulation or legal oversight.
  

These indicators strongly suggest that Bigarizonaco is structured to collect deposits from unsuspecting individuals without providing access to real financial markets.

Conclusion on broker

Bigarizonaco is not a licensed or trustworthy broker. The company distributes false information, uses fabricated licenses, and has been flagged by regulators for illegal activity.

Recommendations:

• Do not open an account with Bigarizonaco.
  
• Do not share your personal documents or payment information with them.
  
• If you have lost funds, gather all evidence and report the case to your bank and law enforcement.
  

For safe and legal trading, only consider brokers that are regulated by respected financial authorities and have transparent operational records.

100KS Fund Broker Review 2025

100KS Fund markets itself as a global broker with “0% stock spreads,” VIP tiers, and round-the-clock service. Scratch the surface and you find a classic cocktail of offshore registrations, anonymous ownership, non-verifiable “awards,” and a proprietary platform that customers say doesn’t behave like a real market venue. This review connects the dots — corporate structure, website history, platform behavior, user complaints—and maps the risk so you can make an informed decision.

Executive Snapshot

• Status: Unregulated, offshore IBC (St. Vincent & the Grenadines; Mwali/Comoros references)
  
• Public claims vs. facts: Claims “since 2017,” but domains appear 2023–2025
  
• Platform: Proprietary web-trader (closed system), not MT4/MT5
  
• Instruments: CFDs on stocks/indices/crypto/metals (per marketing)
  
• Core risk: Persistent reports of non-payment and “pre-withdrawal fees”

Corporate Identity

100KS Fund Ltd. presents as an offshore IBC in St. Vincent & the Grenadines, while its legal pages casually drop Mwali/Comoros references. That dual-jurisdiction footprint isn’t diversification; it’s a regulatory minimization strategy. SVG’s registrar explicitly does not supervise forex activity; Comoros “authorizations” are paperwork mills. In practice, neither setting forces best execution, capital buffers, or client-fund segregation. For a broker that holds customer money and makes a market against them, that’s… convenient.

There’s no searchable license with CySEC, FCA, ASIC, SEC, or any mainstream authority. That matters for two reasons:

1. No prudential oversight (solvency, audits, conduct rules).
   
2. No complaints pathway (ombudsman, compensation scheme).
   If a dispute escalates, you’re not stepping through a regulated resolution playbook; you’re emailing a support inbox in an offshore time zone.
   

Legitimate brokers showcase named directors, a compliance officer, and a physical office you can actually walk into. Here, you get no executives, no board, no phone lines; the single reliable contact is [email protected]. That’s operationally minimal and litigation-resistant: nameless people are hard to sue, and mailbox entities can disappear overnight.

The “since 2017” storyline vs. the calendar

Brand claims longevity; public internet records show meaningful activity only from 2023 onward, with the flagship domain even younger. That’s not a rounding error; it undercuts the entire credibility pitch (past awards, a seasoned team, “thousands of happy clients”). If the founding myth is soft, you should assume everything layered on top needs proof you’ll never get.

Bottom line: This isn’t a broker with a tidy org chart and a proud regulatory badge. It’s a jurisdiction-hopping shell designed to minimize accountability and maximize extraction.

Website & Domain Timeline: The Clock Doesn’t Lie

Reputable brokers accrue digital sediment: archived pages, press releases, API docs, stable legal libraries. 100KS’s trail shows late arrivers (mid-2023+) and frequent reshuffles. That pattern is common among short-cycle boiler rooms that spin up a clean domain, harvest deposits, then rebrand when search results turn toxic.

Sections like “Trading Services” and “Trading Platform” read as stubs or dead links; the “Legal” area hosts boilerplate PDFs you can find copy-pasted across other offshore sites. What’s notably absent:

• Full fee schedules (spreads, commissions, swaps/overnights).
  
• Execution disclosures (LPs, routing, slippage policy, last-look).
  
• Client-money statement (segregation, banks, trust structure).
  
• P&L tax guidance (how fees/taxes are actually handled).
  

A credible broker over-discloses this stuff. Silence is not a neutral choice; it’s a signal.

Years in market ≠ quality, but in brokerage it correlates with infrastructure (risk controls, ops staff, compliance). A 2023–2025 footprint cannot plausibly backfill a 2017 claims deck. If the story and the timestamp diverge, believe the timestamp.

Regulation & Client Protection

Without EU/UK/US/AU authorization, you lose:

• Segregated client funds under enforceable rules.
  
• Best-execution obligations and audit trails.
  
• Capital adequacy requirements (to survive market stress).
  
• Ombudsman escalation and compensation schemes (e.g., FSCS in the UK).
  

Offshore “authorizations” ≠ regulatory supervision. An offshore certificate may look official, but it generally doesn’t police pricing, custody, or conflicts of interest. If your funds are rehypothecated, if spreads widen on news, if withdrawals stall — there’s no statutory lever you can pull.

If something goes wrong, recovery narrows to: chargeback windows (if card-funded), law enforcement reports, and whatever leverage your bank can bring. Crypto rails? Non-reversible by design. Time works against you.

Product & Conditions

CFDs across equities, indices, crypto, metals; copy-trading, VIP tiers, 24/7 support, “0% stock spreads,” and “fast withdrawals.” It’s the greatest hits album of offshore marketing.

What you actually need (and don’t get).

• Published spreads/commission tables per symbol class, not slogans.
  
• Swap rates and how they’re calculated (tonight, not last quarter).
  
• Account ladders (min deposits, margin stop-out levels, fee perks).
  
• Corporate actions policy on CFDs (dividends, splits, rights issues).
  
• Execution venue & LP list, slippage/latency metrics, rejection codes.
  

Instead you’re nudged to register first, where details can be “personalized.” That’s a polite way of saying opaque and variable.

Leverage & margin — the invisible throttle. Offshore shops often dangle 3–30× crypto or 100–500× FX/indices. High leverage isn’t inherently evil, but in an unregulated b-book, it’s a control dial: the house decides your fate under volatility (requotes, widening, margin events). No public ratios? Assume house advantage.

Platform: Proprietary web-trader

100KS doesn’t offer MT4/MT5 or another third-party terminal with exportable logs, independent plugins, and a vast community scrutinizing fills. Instead, you’re in a closed interface where:

• Price feeds can be delayed or synthesized.
  
• Stops can slip in one direction far more than they ever improve (asymmetric slippage).
  
• Disconnects appear at inconvenient moments (right before stops/rollovers).
  
• Order IDs and audit trails are non-portable (good luck proving abuse).

When the broker is counterparty (b-book) and the platform operator, they control both sides of the screen. Without a regulator checking logs, that’s like playing poker in a casino where the dealer, the camera system, and the rules committee are all the same person.

Funding & Withdrawals

Deposit rails: cards, wires, crypto (spotlight). Crypto is emphasized because it’s fast, borderless, and non-reversible — perfect when the business model values inflow over outflow.

Withdrawal pattern (as reported by users):

1. You request a payout.
   
2. Support cites a new prerequisite: “tax prepayment,” “verification deposit,” “international wire fee,” “AML clearance.”
   
3. You pay (some do).
   
4. Funds still don’t arrive; sometimes the account is locked, sometimes you’re told to pay another fee.
   

Reality check: Legit brokers net fees/taxes from proceeds. They don’t require fresh inbound payments to release your own balance. That’s a bright-red heuristic you can apply everywhere.

Acquisition Engine: Referrals and “Success Coaches” 

Instead of organic brand trust, 100KS leans on referrals/IBs, glossy advertorials, and unsolicited DMs from “mentors” or “investors” flaunting results. Missing is a public IB schedule (payout tiers, criteria, disclosures). That opacity encourages aggressive promises with little accountability.

Brokers with real retention don’t need to pressure deposits via social pitches. When growth depends on new money instead of happy, returning clients, you’ve got a churn-and-burn engine — not a brokerage.

Conclusion on 100KS Fund

100KS Fund positions itself as a global broker offering cutting-edge trading opportunities, but the evidence paints a very different picture. Behind the glossy promises of “0% spreads,” VIP tiers, and “fast withdrawals” lies an unregulated offshore entity with no transparent ownership, no recognized license, and a track record of withdrawal failures.

The company’s corporate identity is stitched together across offshore jurisdictions, its website footprint contradicts its claimed operating history, and its proprietary platform operates as a closed system prone to manipulation. Clients report consistent patterns: deposits are easy, but withdrawals trigger fabricated hurdles such as “tax prepayments” or “verification deposits.”

Coupled with aggressive referral-driven marketing and the absence of client protections, 100KS Fund shows the hallmarks of a boiler-room CFD operation rather than a trustworthy financial intermediary. Investors have little to no recourse if funds are withheld.

Final verdict: 100KS Fund is not a reliable broker but rather a high-risk scheme designed to extract deposits without accountability. Traders and investors are strongly advised to avoid this company and to choose only regulated brokers in recognized jurisdictions where investor protections and legal remedies are real.

Defazz Broker Review 2025

Defazz (operating via domains defaazz.com and deefazz.com) positions itself as a global brokerage platform, claiming to provide access to forex, stocks, CFDs, and cryptocurrencies. The company advertises low entry barriers (minimum deposit from $250), high leverage up to 1:100, and additional perks such as bonuses, “fund insurance,” and personal account managers. On its website, Defazz presents itself as a reliable and innovative broker with an office in London and alleged licences from leading regulators.

A closer examination shows that these statements do not withstand scrutiny. The domain was only registered in June 2025, the UK address is no more than a virtual office, and the licences mentioned on the site are fabricated. Behind the promises of secure trading lies an unregulated and anonymous entity. Numerous client reports confirm the fraudulent nature of the project: blocked withdrawals, invented fees of up to 40%, account freezes, and threats when victims attempted to take legal action.

This review gathers all available facts about Defazz — from its false regulatory claims to user experiences — and demonstrates why the broker should be considered a high-risk scam operation.

Company Profile & Web Footprint

Brand & domains. The operation trades as Defazz and runs via defaazz.com with reported mirrors such as deefazz.com and a cabinet at web.defaazz.com. Multiple domains/subdomains are typical of short-lived schemes that rotate URLs to evade blocks and reputation drag.

“Founded in 2020” claim vs. reality. Marketing copy suggests a 2020 start. Independent checks contradict this: defaazz.com was registered only in June 2025, with no verifiable Defazz activity before that. The “long track record” narrative appears fabricated to manufacture credibility.

Address. The website cites 175 Piccadilly, St James’s, London W1J 9TB—a prestigious serviced-office location. There is no evidence Defazz operates there as a regulated UK firm or maintains a real office presence. Using a glossy address without corporate traceability is a known credibility prop.

Ownership & management. No legal entity name, incorporation number, directors, or beneficial owners are disclosed. WHOIS is privacy-masked. Hosting traces point to offshore infrastructure (Seychelles/Hong Kong mentioned in investigations). This depth of anonymity is incompatible with legitimate brokerage activity.

Contacts. Support is limited to [email protected]; no phone number, no verified social media, and no transparent escalation channels. A legitimate cross-border broker normally maintains staffed phone lines, live chat, and corporate social profiles.

Regulatory Status & Legal Standing

• No valid licence. Checks find no authorisation for Defazz with reputable regulators. The project references a CySEC “No. 3574D” and an FCA-style number “87345”, neither of which reconciles to a genuine licence. (CySEC’s numbering conventions don’t match that “D” suffix format, and a real FCA authorisation would be publicly searchable.)
  
• Not in the Bank of Russia register. Defazz is absent from the official list of forex dealers allowed to service Russian clients—meaning activity targeting that market is illegal there.
  
• Presumed offshore registration. Investigators point to St. Vincent and the Grenadines—a jurisdiction notorious for ease of company formation and lack of investment-services supervision.
  
• Website legal docs. Terms/Policies are generic and omit crucial facts (licence details, legal entity name). Clauses include one-sided powers (e.g., discretionary account blocks) and class-action waivers—language that removes client recourse rather than protecting it.
  

Implication: Client money sits outside any investor-protection regime. Disputes have no regulator-backed pathway.

The Pitch vs. The Product

What Defazz advertises

• Multi-asset CFDs/FX/crypto, leverage up to 1:100
  
• Low entry ($250 minimum), bonuses, “insured funds”, and personal managers
  
• “Modern, innovative” platform promising simple access and high potential returns
  

What users actually report

• Opacity & contradictions: Figures and conditions differ across pages; specifics on spreads, commissions, swaps are absent or non-committal.
  
• Withdrawal traps: Clients asked to pay 15–40% “taxes/fees” upfront to “unlock” withdrawals. After paying, new obstacles appear; payouts don’t materialise.
  
• Platform manipulation:
  
  • Quotes don’t match independent feeds
    
  • Stops ignored, executions delayed up to 24–72 hours
    
  • Balances zeroed right after withdrawal requests, explained away as “technical issues” or sudden “losses”
    
• Account freezes: After top-ups slow or a withdrawal is requested, accounts are suspended under vague “violations” or endless KYC loops.
  

Conclusion: The “offer” is a façade. The real product is a deposit-collection funnel with technical and contractual levers to prevent outflows.

Client Testimonies (Representative Patterns)

• Case A (Moscow): Deposited RUB 2.2M. On requesting a payout, was told to pre-pay RUB 800K as a mandatory fee. On refusal, the account was blocked without funds returned.
  
• Case B (Yaroslavl): Invested RUB 145K after email outreach. “Profits” displayed, but any withdrawal attempt triggered new “taxes/fees” demands; account then frozen.
  
• Case C (Krasnodar): Active trading showed sizeable profits. At withdrawal, balance reset to zero; support cited a “technical failure,” refused compensation.
  
• Case D (Yekaterinburg): After filing a court claim, received threatening emails from a so-called “legal department” demanding to withdraw the lawsuit.
  

Across dozens of similar accounts, the arc is identical: early gains + pressure to top-up → blocked withdrawals → escalating pre-payment demands → silence or threats.

Network Links & Clone Behaviour

• Mirrors & subdomains. Beyond defaazz.com, the project was observed at deefazz.com and web.defaazz.com. Domain churn is standard in serial scams.
  
• Shared operators. Independent investigations group Defazz with SmartTradingCenter and Auros-ai, citing identical funnels, recycled narratives (AI trading, insured funds, dedicated analysts), and even overlapping crypto wallets receiving deposits.
  
• Blacklist presence. Defazz appears across scam trackers and anti-fraud watchlists. The pattern suggests a multi-brand factory that spins up sites for a few months, harvests deposits, then shutters and re-skins.

Red-Flag Checklist

• Unlicensed in any reputable jurisdiction
  
• Fake licence numbers and unverifiable claims
  
• Anonymous ownership; privacy-masked WHOIS; no legal entity disclosed
  
• Serviced-office UK address with no verifiable FCA status
  
• Aggressive marketing (cold outreach/spam), unrealistic returns (hundreds of % p.a.)
  
• Opaque terms, bonus traps, one-sided rules enabling arbitrary blocks
  
• Withdrawal “unlock fees” (15–40%) and moving goalposts
  
• Platform irregularities: mismatched quotes, ignored stops, delayed fills, balance wipes
  
• Account freezes and intimidation when victims push back
  

If a broker ticks even a couple of these boxes, caution is warranted. Defazz ticks all of them.

Conclusion on Defazz

Defazz presents itself as a modern, innovative, and trustworthy broker, but in reality, it demonstrates all the hallmarks of a fraudulent operation. The company does not hold any valid regulatory licence, despite loudly advertising affiliations with CySEC and the FCA. These claims are false—no such licences exist under the numbers Defazz cites. The use of a prestigious London address is also misleading, as there is no evidence the broker operates there or is incorporated in the UK.

The ownership structure is completely hidden: no company name, no directors, no beneficial owners. Domains are freshly registered (2025) and masked under private WHOIS. This anonymity is paired with offshore hosting in jurisdictions known for being used by scam operations.

Trading conditions look attractive at first glance—low minimum deposit, high leverage, bonuses, and dedicated managers. But in practice, the platform is opaque and manipulative. Victims consistently report withdrawal blackmail, where “unlock fees” or “taxes” of 15–40% must be prepaid before funds are released (and still never are). Others describe fake profits wiped out, execution delays, ignored stop-losses, and complete account freezes.

Dozens of complaints reveal the same pattern: friendly onboarding, initial “profits” to build trust, escalating pressure to deposit more, and eventual refusal to release funds. Some clients even reported threats after filing legal claims.

Finally, Defazz is not a standalone entity. It is linked to other scam platforms (SmartTradingCenter, Auros-ai) via shared infrastructure and tactics, suggesting it is part of a broader serial fraud network.

Verdict: Defazz is not a broker but a carefully staged scam. The risk of losing all deposited funds is essentially 100%. Investors have no protection, no regulator to appeal to, and no legal safeguards.

Recommendation: Do not engage with Defazz under any circumstances. If you have already deposited funds, cease further payments, gather documentation, attempt chargeback procedures, and file reports with your local regulator or police. Raising awareness is crucial to prevent others from falling into the same trap.

Raliplen Broker Review 2025

Raliplen is an online trading brand operating primarily via raliplen.com and raliplen.net. The .com domain was registered on 10 February 2025, while the .net domain appeared in late July 2025 — a very short web footprint for a firm that markets itself as experienced and global. The site targets an international audience in English, including the CIS region.

Key takeaways

• Unlicensed: No authorization from FCA, CySEC, ASIC, SEC/CFTC, or any reputable regulator.
  
• Official warnings: Flagged by Canadian provincial regulators (ASC, BCSC, AMF/Québec) and listed by Belgium’s FSMA in July 2025.
  
• Anonymity & inconsistencies: No disclosed legal entity; glossy claims without verifiable evidence.
  
• High-risk terms: 1:500 leverage, vague “VIP” tiers, and a white-label web terminal on a third-party domain.
  
• Complaint pattern: Blocked withdrawals, invented “fees/taxes,” pressure from “personal managers,” and aggressive solicitation.

Claimed corporate profile

• Address (claimed): 54 Fenchurch Street, London EC3M 3JY, UK.
  
• Contacts (claimed): +44 2039617102, +44 2038622925; [email protected].
  
• Social presence: No active, verifiable social media channels identified.
  

The London address is a common office-block location often cited by shell entities. There is no public evidence of genuine operations from this site and no disclosed legal entity name or registration number connected to Raliplen.

Regulation & licenses

A search across major regulatory registers shows no license of any kind for Raliplen. The firm is not authorized by the UK’s FCA or other top-tier regulators (CySEC, ASIC, NFA/CFTC, etc.). 

Conversely, multiple regulators have warned consumers:

• Alberta (ASC): Placed Raliplen on its Investment Caution List on 11 June 2025.
  
• British Columbia (BCSC): Issued a warning on 9 July 2025, stating Raliplen is not registered to trade in securities or derivatives in the province.
  
• Québec (AMF): States Raliplen is not authorized to solicit investors in the province.
  
• Belgium (FSMA): In a consolidated update on 24 July 2025, Raliplen (raliplen.com) is grouped with dozens of illegal online platforms that typically block withdrawals and operate without licenses.
  

Raliplen operates outside any reputable regulatory framework. Client funds receive no statutory protection (no compensation scheme; no recognized dispute resolution).

Trading offer at a glance

Raliplen’s marketing reads like a standard lure for newcomers:

• Minimum deposit: from $250.
  
• Leverage: up to 1:500 (far beyond legal caps in most regulated markets—e.g., 1:30 in the EU/UK for retail clients).
  
• Instruments: broad CFDs menu—crypto, stocks, indices, commodities, metals; even NFTs are mentioned. No credible liquidity providers disclosed.

• Platform: “MetaTrader” is referenced, but access is via a web terminal hosted on a third-party domain: webtrader.aternlyx.tech. This is a white-label environment widely observed among scam clusters; it allows full control over pricing/latency and can simulate fills and P&L internally.
  
• Account tiers / VIP: Multi-level “VIP” statuses with promises of tighter costs, bonuses, and privileged service. No transparent fee schedule or instrument specifications published.
  
• Education & extras: “Personal manager 24/7,” signals, copy-trading, and market “analysis.” These features primarily function as sales tools to nudge larger deposits.

Deposits & withdrawals

• Funding methods: Cards (Visa/Mastercard), bank transfer, crypto, and sometimes Apple/Google Pay intermediaries.
  
• Withdrawal reality: Numerous accounts describe a predictable pattern: small early “test” payouts (to build trust), followed by rejections, delays, or fabricated charges (15–50% “tax/fee/insurance”) once larger sums or profits are requested. These payments do not unlock the funds.
  

User feedback: recurring red flags

While some suspiciously generic five-star blurbs praise “low spreads” and “friendly support,” the overwhelming pattern in independent forums and complaint boards is consistent and damning:

1. Frozen accounts on withdrawal requests. Users report sudden blocks or KYC hurdles appearing only after asking for payouts.
   
2. Pressure from “personal managers.” Call-center “analysts” push clients to top up, promise safe or guaranteed returns (a regulatory red line), then disappear.
   
3. Invented fees. “Taxes,” “clearance fees,” “insurance deposits,” or “liquidity unlock charges” are demanded upfront; paying them rarely results in any release of funds.
   
4. Aggressive solicitation. Cold calls, email spam, lead-gen through social networks and even job sites; scripted tactics with office-noise ambience to simulate legitimacy.
   

Scam-marker checklist

Raliplen exhibits nearly all hallmarks of a boiler-room CFD scam:

• No legal entity disclosed; no company number, no audited accounts, no regulator.
  
• Brand-new domains, rapidly replaced or supplemented (.com → .net) as reputation deteriorates.
  
• White-label webtrader on a third-party host (aternlyx.tech), a telltale of scam networks that recycle the same back-end for many “brands.”
  
• Unrealistic leverage (1:500) and vague “VIP” tiers with marketing bonuses.
  
• Opaque pricing/costs: no detailed instrument specs, swaps, or stable T&Cs.
  
• Withdrawal obstruction: fabricated fees, shifting rules, and unilateral term changes.
  
• Evidence-free claims of global reach, licensing compliance, and round-the-clock expert support.
  
• Regulatory warnings already issued in multiple jurisdictions.
  

Likely links to a wider scheme

The shared infrastructure (the aternlyx.tech web terminal), recycled marketing copy, UK virtual addresses, and +44 20… phone lines strongly suggest Raliplen is one of several interchangeable labels operated by the same boiler-room apparatus. Regulators often publish group warnings, listing Raliplen alongside similarly structured sites that emerged within the same timeframe and exhibit identical behavior patterns.

Conclusion on Raliplen

Raliplen is not a legitimate broker. It is unregulated, publicly warned against by multiple authorities, and displays the full pattern of a high-risk, likely fraudulent operation: anonymity, engineered trading environment, hard-sell deposit tactics, and systematic withdrawal obstruction. There is no client-fund protection, no credible oversight, and no reason to believe profits (or even principal) are ever safely withdrawable.

Do not deposit with Raliplen. If you are researching it for an investment, treat the brand as avoid at all costs.

If you already deposited: immediate steps

1. Stop sending money and cut contact with “managers.”
   
2. Document everything (screenshots, emails, chat logs, call records, transaction receipts).
   
3. Card/bank transfer: Contact your bank immediately to request a chargeback (reason code: fraud/misrepresentation). Provide your documentation.
   
4. Crypto transfers: Record the transaction hashes; engage your local cybercrime unit and consider reputable blockchain-analytics services via law enforcement or your counsel.
   
5. File reports with your national regulator and the authorities that already issued warnings (e.g., ASC, BCSC, AMF, FSMA).
   

Beware “recovery” scams—cold callers or websites promising to get your money back for an upfront fee are almost always secondary fraud.

Brevis Technology Review 2025

Brevis Technology (brevistechnology.co) is a recently launched online trading platform that promotes itself as an innovative global broker. Behind the glossy website and promises of high returns, however, lies a troubling reality. Our investigation reveals a classic case of an unregulated “boiler room” operation, designed to lure unsuspecting investors and prevent them from ever withdrawing their funds.

This review examines the broker’s registration details, trading conditions, reputation, and the clear red flags that categorize Brevis Technology as a fraudulent scheme.

Registration and Legal Information

Brevis Technology’s domain was registered only on June 13, 2025, making it a very young and untested platform. Despite claims of “operating since 2014,” the website’s short history proves otherwise.

The company attempts to present legitimacy by displaying a Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) code belonging to Brevis Premere Capital AB, a Swedish IT consulting firm established in 2014. However, no evidence connects this legitimate Swedish entity with Brevis Technology. In fact, no records in the FCA, CySEC, or other reputable regulators list Brevis Technology as a licensed broker.

Even more concerning, the Bank of Russia officially blacklisted Brevis Technology on August 28, 2025, citing signs of illegal financial activity. The site’s domain is privately registered in the U.S. with no trace of the actual owners, another hallmark of a scam operation.

Ownership and Management

Brevis Technology discloses no information about its owners, executives, or corporate structure. There is no “About Us” section, no team introduction, and no verifiable corporate address.

The supposed connection to Brevis Premere Capital AB is almost certainly fabricated to mislead investors. In reality, the project appears to be run by anonymous offshore operators who deliberately conceal their identities. Promotional articles online even claim that the broker is “licensed and globally recognized”—a direct contradiction to verifiable facts.

Trading Conditions and Platform

Platforms

Brevis Technology advertises a “powerful platform” and mentions WebTrader access. Some promotional content refers to MetaTrader, but no proof exists that MT4/MT5 is supported. In practice, traders are likely given access to a basic web-based simulator designed to imitate real trading.

Assets

The broker claims to offer a wide range of instruments:

• Cryptocurrencies
  
• Stocks
  
• Precious metals
  
• Forex pairs
  
• CFDs on indices
  

However, trade execution and price feeds are entirely controlled by the broker, meaning clients are never connected to real markets.

Account Types

Brevis Technology offers six different account tiers, each tied to progressively larger deposit requirements. The entry-level Bronze account starts at $300 and comes with only basic trading education, while the Silver account at $600 adds weekly market analysis and access to broker-provided signals.

From there, the Gold account requires a $1,000 deposit and includes a 5% cashback, a 10% welcome bonus, and a basic educational course. 

The Platinum account raises the bar to $5,000, promising higher bonuses, additional cashback options, and the services of a personal account manager.

At the upper end, the Diamond account demands a massive $50,000 deposit, offering “advanced training,” direct access to analysts, and claims of “no withdrawal fees.” Finally, the VIP account sits at the top with a staggering $200,000 minimum, marketed as providing personalized service, a 25% welcome bonus, and premium-level perks.

The entire account structure is clearly designed to pressure traders into depositing increasingly larger sums. The so-called “bonuses” act as a trap: once accepted, they impose strict conditions that require traders to generate unrealistic trading volumes before being allowed to withdraw funds.

Deposits and Withdrawals

The broker emphasizes cryptocurrency payments (BTC, ETH), occasionally mentioning cards or bank transfers. In reality, most clients report being forced to deposit via crypto—an irreversible payment method.

Withdrawals are practically impossible. The broker requires a minimum balance of $50,000 before any withdrawal is allowed—an absurd condition. Even then, clients report being asked to pay fake “taxes” or “verification fees” before requests are processed.

Reputation and Client Feedback

Brevis Technology’s reputation is overwhelmingly negative. Dozens of reviews across Trustpilot, Russian-language forums, and personal accounts describe identical scam patterns:

• Blocked accounts and ignored withdrawals – clients can deposit freely, but withdrawal requests result in sudden “verifications” or account freezes.
  
• Surprise fees – victims are asked to pay fabricated taxes, insurance fees, or AML checks. One client was told to open a Swiss bank account to retrieve funds.
  
• Loss through “managers” – traders who allowed “analysts” to trade on their behalf quickly saw their accounts wiped out.
  
• Aggressive sales tactics – initial cold calls convince victims to deposit small sums, after which “retention managers” push for larger deposits, often with promises of doubling the investment.
  

For example:

• A Polish client, Tymon, reported being shown fake profits before being asked to pay multiple fees for withdrawal. Once he refused, communication ceased.
  
• Another client, Marek, dealt with an “analyst” via WhatsApp who showed account growth, but Marek never recovered either profits or principal.
  
• Russian users describe Brevis Technology bluntly: “You can deposit as much as you want, but when you try to withdraw—it’s impossible.”
  

The few positive reviews online appear to be fabricated or paid promotions, as they conflict with the overwhelming majority of scam reports.

Scam Tactics and Red Flags

Brevis Technology exhibits every sign of a fraudulent broker:

• No regulation – blacklisted by the Bank of Russia.
  
• Anonymity – no ownership details, fake LEI used to create legitimacy.
  
• Crypto-only funding – ensures deposits cannot be reversed.
  
• Unrealistic withdrawal rules – $50,000 minimum balance, bonus restrictions.
  
• Aggressive cold-calling – typical boiler-room strategy.
  
• False promises – “guaranteed profits,” large bonuses, “premium” accounts.
  
• Affiliate/referral schemes – recruiting new victims to sustain the scam.
  

These tactics align Brevis Technology with other fraudulent projects, including platforms like Alrakamiya and BigArizonaCo, suggesting a broader organized scam network.

Domain and Technical Details

• Domain: brevistechnology.co
  
• Registered: June 13, 2025 (Porkbun, U.S.)
  
• Hosting: Cloudflare, U.S. servers
  
• Owner details: Hidden by “Private by Design, LLC”
  

The website itself appears to be built on a simple WordPress template, filled with generic marketing text and stock images. The use of a recently issued LEI code from an unrelated Swedish company further highlights the deceptive practices.

Conclusion on Brevis Technology

Brevis Technology is a fraudulent broker. It operates without licenses, hides its true operators, and exploits clients through impossible withdrawal conditions and aggressive deposit schemes.

Key Takeaways:

• No regulatory oversight, already blacklisted in Russia.
  
• Fabricated claims of legitimacy using unrelated companies.
  
• Consistent client complaints of fraud and theft.
  
• Strong indicators of being part of a larger scam network.
  

Verdict: Brevis Technology is a scam broker. Investors should avoid it entirely and treat any contact from its representatives as a red flag. Those who have already deposited funds are advised to gather evidence, contact their banks for chargebacks, and report the fraud to authorities immediately.